President's Pardoning Powers
Context:
The President of India recently rejected the mercy petition of a convict involved in a heinous rape and murder case.
This marks the third mercy plea rejected by the President since assuming office in July 2022.
Constitutional Provisions:
Article 72 empowers the President to grant pardons, reprieves, respites, or remissions of punishment, or to suspend, remit, or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence.
This power extends to:
Cases where the punishment is by a Court Martial.
Cases where the punishment is for an offence against a Union law.
All cases where the sentence is a sentence of death, irrespective of Union or State law
Thus, President’s pardoning power wider than that of the Governor.
Meaning of key terms:
Pardon completely absolves the convict from all sentences, punishments, and disqualifications.
Commutation is the substitution of one form of punishment for a lighter form
For example, death sentence to life imprisonment.
Remission is reducing the period of the sentence without changing its character.
Respite is awarding a lesser sentence due to some special fact, such as the physical disability of a convict or the pregnancy of a woman offender.
Reprieve is a stay of the execution of a sentence (especially that of death) for a temporary period.
Nature of Pardoning Powers:
The pardoning power is an executive act, distinct from judicial power.
It is not an extension of the judicial process but a check to provide a human touch and correct potential judicial errors.
Nature of the Power: It is a constitutional power, not a statutory or discretionary grace. It is intended to:
Correct judicial errors
Mitigate undue harshness
Introduce a humanitarian element into criminal justice
Aid and Advice of Council of Ministers
Article 74(1): The President exercises this power on the advice of the Council of Ministers.
President cannot exercise independent discretion in pardoning matters.
President may return advice once for reconsideration, but is bound thereafter.
The power is subject to limited judicial review.
It can be challenged if the decision is arbitrary, irrational, mala fide, or passed without application of mind.
President is constitutionally superior in death sentence cases, even if the Governor has rejected the mercy petition earlier.