Personality Rights & Commercial Courts Act, 2015

Personality Rights & Commercial Courts Act, 2015
  • Context:

  • The issue has gained prominence due to a recent case in the Delhi High Court involving actor Salman Khan and a China-based AI voice generation platform.

  • The platform filed an application to vacate an interim injunction that protected the actor's personality rights.

  • Personality Rights:

  • Personality rights protect the commercial value of an individual’s identity—name, image, voice, likeness, signature, gestures, etc.

  • Though not codified as a separate statute in India, courts derive them from:

  • Personality rights recognize the economic value of identity and are distinct from statutory IP rights.

  • Article 21 (Right to life and privacy)K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017)

  • Article 19(1)(g) guarantees the right to conduct business and is subject to reasonable restrictions and cannot be invoked by foreign entities before Indian courts

  • It does not include personal issues like:

  • Matrimonial or family disputes

  • Succession and inheritance matters

  • Personal service disputes

  • Purely personal or non-commercial civil disputes

  • These rights are distinct from statutory IP rights, but operate strongly in the commercial domain, especially for celebrities

  • Personality rights claims are typically filed under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

  • Under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, a dispute qualifies as “commercial” if it arises out of:

  • Trade and commerce

  • Commercial exploitation

  • Business transactions

  • Economic value and loss

  • Personality rights cases typically involve:

  • Unauthorised commercial exploitation of identity

  • Monetary gain by third parties

  • Economic harm or dilution of brand value

  • Hence, courts treat them as commercial disputes, not purely personal or privacy claims

  • Why the Commercial Courts Act 2015?

  • A commercial dispute refers to disputes arising out of ordinary transactions of merchants, traders, bankers, financiers and business entities, where the subject matter is commercial, economic, or business-oriented in nature.

  • The reason is that celebrities rarely hold conventional intellectual property (IP) rights over their identities, necessitating the use of this Act for adjudication.

  • Personality rights claims are typically led under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, since celebrities rarely hold conventional IP rights over their identity.